Legal Opinion

DeBow v. Hatfield

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 12, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

35 N.J. Super. 291 (1955)

114 A.2d 10

ROY S. DeBOW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

BESSIE LETSON HATFIELD, WIDOW OF GEORGE ELY HATFIELD, DECEASED, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 2, 1955.

Decided May 12, 1955.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hunziker and Hunziker, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel Morris argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

The present appeal involves the Tax Act of 1903 (c. 208), long a source of litigation and still…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bedell v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Colton v. DepewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  3. Content v. DaltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Rodgers v. CressmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  5. Spottiswoode v. Morris & Essex RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'KEEFFE v. SnyderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  2. Robinson-Shore Development Co. v. GallagherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Meyers v. PavalkisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Mulford v. AbottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Caruso v. HuntNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API