In Re Davis
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM GRAY,’Justice.
Paul Ray Davis was convicted and sentenced in accordance with a plea agreement. Davis did not seek a new trial. Can the trial court order a new trial on its own motion? Because we find that a trial court does not have authority to grant a new trial in a criminal case unless it is requested by the defendant, we hold that the order granting a new trial on the court’s motion is void and conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.
Factual Background
A grand jury indicted Davis for possession of one gram or more, but less than four grams of a controlled substance. See Tex.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Third DistrictCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Perkins v. Court of Appeals for Third Supreme Judicial District of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Smith v. FlackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re Keeter, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
- In Re Piper, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
- In Re Keeling, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- Wright v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
- In Re Altschul, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.