Legal Opinion

In Re Davis

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided April 8, 1999No. 10-99-030-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOM GRAY,’Justice.

Paul Ray Davis was convicted and sentenced in accordance with a plea agreement. Davis did not seek a new trial. Can the trial court order a new trial on its own motion? Because we find that a trial court does not have authority to grant a new trial in a criminal case unless it is requested by the defendant, we hold that the order granting a new trial on the court’s motion is void and conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.

Factual Background

A grand jury indicted Davis for possession of one gram or more, but less than four grams of a controlled substance. See Tex.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Third DistrictCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Perkins v. Court of Appeals for Third Supreme Judicial District of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Smith v. FlackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Keeter, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
  2. In Re Piper, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
  3. In Re Keeling, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  4. Wright v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  5. In Re Altschul, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API