Legal Opinion

Smith v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 31, 1921No. Separate actions of Trespass on the case Nos. 12 and 13PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court.

It is well settled by the decisions in this state that each count of plaintiff’s declaration must set out a complete cause of action. And one reason for the requirement is that if one or more counts are stricken out, each of the remaining counts may be good and complete in itself.

It is stated by Woolley, in his work on Delaware Practice, §§ 343( second paragraph), 344, and 345, that—

“Sec. 343. In all cases in which there are two or more counts — whether there is actually but one cause of action or several — each count purports upon the face…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Craig v. BurrisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tharp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. HawkeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1928
  3. Howard National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  4. Le Gates v. EnnisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
  5. Parke v. BlackistonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1841

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API