Legal Opinion

Bavisotto v. United States

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided February 10, 1937No. 1369-APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Motion is made herein to strike from the answer allegations of fraud and misrepresentation, upon the ground that the premiums upon the life insurance policy in question have not been returned nor tendered back to the plaintiff. The complaint alleges that on July 1, 1927, a lapsed war risk insurance policy issued to plaintiff in the amount of $10,000 was reinstated and converted to a five-year converted policy. A renewal of such policy was subsequently granted. It is alleged that the premiums were timely paid and that by reason of the total and permanent-disability of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Neblett v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Sun Insurance Office v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  5. Blaeser v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berger v. Manhattan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Moss v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API