Legal Opinion
In Re Conroy
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 23, 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The Burlington County Ethics Committee filed two presentments with this Court charging respondent, John S. Conroy, III, with unethical conduct.
I
The first presentment arises out of a personal injury negligence case which respondent was retained to handle. In April 1967, Mr. Conroy had a conference with his clients, husband and wife, in connection with an offer of a $2500 settlement which had been proposed by the insurance carrier covering the tortfeasor. After being advised that the attorney’s foe would be $800, the clients authorized acceptance of the offer and shortly thereafter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re BannerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goldberg v. New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Conn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 635.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Docket No. 22-95Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- 24 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1745, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,013 in Re Harvey Goldberg, Debtor v. New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection and Chicago Title Insurance Company. Chicago Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.