Legal Opinion

In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Docket No. 22-95

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue raised in this appeal is whether a law firm that concentrates its practice in the field of collections law may, upon receiving checks payable to its clients, endorse the checks and deduct the firm’s contingent fees where the client consents to that practice in the retainer agreement but does not thereafter expressly authorize the deductions with full knowledge of the total amounts collected.

In response to a formal inquiry, the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (ACPE) concluded that a law firm may not, upon receiving checks on behalf of its clients, endorse the checks in its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. StevensSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. In Re Opinion No. 26 of the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. In Re ConroySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 635.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leeds v. Chase Manhattan BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. In Re Opinion 682 of the Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API