Legal Opinion

Alaska State Housing Authority v. Sipary

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1983No. 6946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

This appeal presents a dispute over the right to fire insurance proceeds received by Alaska State Housing Authority (ASHA) following the destruction of two houses. The houses were being purchased from ASHA under conditional sales contracts, one by James Sipary, the other by Henry Sookiayak. Sipary and Sookiayak were participants in a program aimed at alleviating housing problems in remote areas of Alaska. Under the program, ASHA supplied building materials and supervised the construction of over 200 houses in native villages and sold the houses to participants.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Farnsworth v. SteinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philbin v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Baker v. Ryan Air, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Philbin v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API