Legal Opinion

United States v. Condren

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1994No. 92-09017PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

Gary Frank Condren’s sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm was enhanced under Sentencing Guidelines § 2K2.1(b)(5) because illegal drugs, in addition to the firearm, were found in his home. The only issue on appeal is the construction to be given the “specific offense characteristic” (sentence enhancement) found in that section: “used or possessed any firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony offense”. We AFFIRM.

I

On January 13, 1992, Dallas undercover police officers traded two televisions and a VCR to Condren, in exchange for five pieces…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. United States v. Fortino Saucedo VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Michael E. WyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Darrell Regans, Also Known as Kevin PriceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Spire Warren RoutonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Scott NaleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API