Legal Opinion

May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktien-Gesellschaft

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 14, 1933No. 97PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Alleging that it paid, under duress, sums of money as security for general average contribution, these libels are filed by appellant, as assignee for cargo owners. A special commissioner’s report in favor of the appellee was confirmed by the court below.

The ship Isis, of 7,000 tons dead weight, equipped with twin screws and driven by engines of a total of 2,400 horse power, carried. *249cargo for appellant’s assignors for Bremen, Hamburg, and Antwerp, It is not questioned that when the vessel left her loading ports on the Pacific Coast she was seaworthy, properly manned and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The IrrawaddySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. The JasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Charles Pfizer & Co. v. Convoy S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  5. Compania De Navigacion La Flecha v. BrauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Jl LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. In re Mitsui & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933
  3. United States v. American Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. The IndienDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1933
  5. American-West African Line, Inc. v. Socony Vacuum Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API