Legal Opinion

Joe Esco South-West Tire Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1983No. CIV-80-1377, CIV-80-1378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Plaintiff-taxpayers filed these consolidated actions for refunds of taxes paid for their fiscal years ending in 1973, 1974 and 1975. Generally, a corporation was entitled for those tax years to a “surtax exemption.” However, if two or more corporations were members of a “controlled group of corporations,” they would be taxed as if they were a single corporation and they would have to share a single surtax exemption. In this case, the United States contends that the two Plaintiffs are members of a “controlled group of corporations” because they are members of a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eateries, Inc. v. J. R. Simplot Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. New Mexico Banquest Investors Corp. v. Peters Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. NM BANQUEST INVESTORS v. Peters Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Eateries, Inc. v. J. R. Simplot Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API