Kennedy v. Flagg
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Per curiam
On plaintiff’s exceptions to the direction of a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff rested his case on his own testimony. In testing the propriety of directing the verdict, all the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to him. Lewiston Trust Co. v. Deveno et al., 145 Me. 224, 74 A. (2nd) 457, and cases cited therein.
Plaintiff testified that he was proceeding at moderate speed along a highway approximately 18 feet wide, on his proper side thereof; that the road “didn’t look too good,” and he decided to turn back and take another; that he saw a driveway on his left and elected to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Esponette v. WisemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Fernald v. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Verrill v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Lewiston Trust Co. v. DevenoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. GroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Gamache v. CoscoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Williams v. KinneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Blaisdell v. ReidSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Williams v. KinneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.