Legal Opinion

Doe & Associates Law Offices v. Napolitano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2001No. 99-15797PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

252 F.3d 1026 (9th Cir. 2001)

DOE & ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JANET NAPOLITANO, Attorney General of the State of Arizona; RONALD S. REINSTEIN, Honorable Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 99-15797, 99-17464

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted, October 5, 2000--San Francisco, California

Opinion Filed April 23, 2001

Order Filed June 6, 2001

Mark I. Harrison, Bryan Cave LLP, Phoenix, Arizona, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Randall M. Howe, Assistant Attorney General,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Worldwide Church of God v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Joel Charchenko v. City of StillwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanai v. SanaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. St. Luke's Subacute Care Hospital, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API