Legal Opinion
United States v. E.J.T. Construction Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 8, 1978No. Civ. A. No. 76-41PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, District Judge:
This is an action brought pursuant to the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a, et seq., involving claims arising out of two construction projects at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware.1 Plaintiff, Joseph T. Richardson, Inc. (“Richardson”), was the supplier of labor and materials for defendant Hydro-Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (“Hydro-Mechanical”), a subcontractor of the prime contractor, defendant E.J.T. Construction Company (“E.J.T.”). The defendant American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, (“American Casualty” or “the surety”) is the surety for E.J.T.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Johnson Service Company v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Lansdale Finishers, Inc. And Automatic Finishing Systems, Inc. Appeal of Automatic Finishing Systems, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Arnold Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- United States Ex Rel. Hussmann Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Morefield Communications, Inc. v. Pursel Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Morefield Communications, Inc. v. Pursel Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Morefield Communications, Inc. v. Pursel Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.