Legal Opinion

Happy Endings Dog Rescue, a Texas Non-Profit Corporation v. Jon Layne Gregory, DVM and Donna J. Gregory

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 2, 2016No. NUMBER 13-16-00042-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice Rodriguez

A jury awarded $200,000 in damages plus attorney’s fees to appellees Jon Layne Gregory, DVM, and Donna J. Gregory in their suit against appellant Happy Endings Dog Rescue (Happy Endings). 1 The Gregories sued Happy Endings for violating a deed restriction which prohibited Happy Endings from running a veterinary clinic or veterinary dispensary at its location. By seven issues on appeal, Happy Endings challenges the Gregories’ pleadings and evidence concerning damages as well as the award of attorney’s fees. We reverse and render. 2

I. Background

The following is…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Low v. HenryTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2020
  2. Socorro Gonzalez v. Antonio Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API