Legal Opinion

Miericke v. Lemoine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1990No. 05-89-01453-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENOCH, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Susan Sebastian Lemoine Miericke, is attempting to appeal an award of attorney’s fees and costs from a habeas corpus proceeding. Because this Court has no jurisdiction to review the granting of a writ of habeas corpus, Gray v. Rankin, 594 S.W.2d 409, 409 (Tex.1980) (per curiam), we requested briefs on the issue of whether this Court has jurisdiction to review an award of attorney’s fees and costs emanating from a habeas corpus proceeding. We hold that this Court has jurisdiction to review the award of attorney’s fees and costs.

Lemoine brought a writ of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. RankinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dallas Oil & Gas, Inc. v. MouerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Jernigan v. JerniganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Brown v. Gulf Coast MacHine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bryon Brandon Riggs v. Laura Elizabeth Pillans, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011
  2. Ex Parte E.A.B., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API