Legal Opinion

Bilicki v. W. T. Grant Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1968No. Docket 2,877, 2,878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

The determinative question in this case is whether or not the plaintiffs had psittacosis. This was a question requiring expert testimony to be considered by the jury for a finding of fact at the trial.

Defendant W. T. Grant Company purchased parakeets from third-party, defendant Beniteau Bird Company and in turn sold one to the plaintiff wife. Upon bringing the bird home, she found that it was sickly and attempted to nurse it to health. Approximately three weeks later plaintiff wife became ill, showing symptoms of fever, cough and pneumonia. She entered Henry Ford Hospital with a preliminary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yates v. WenkMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Konieczka v. Mt. Clemens Metal Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hunter v. Village of IthacaMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bilicki v. W. T. Grant Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Bilicki v. W. T. Grant Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bilicki v. W. T. Grant Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API