Legal Opinion

Edmonson v. Coughlin

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 30, 1998No. 6:94-cv-06144PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This action is brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated his constitutional rights, while he was confined at Attica Correctional Facility (“Attica”). Defendants include Thomas A. Coughlin, then Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), Attica Superintendent Walter R. Kelly, and other supervisory staff, correction officers and civilian staff at Attica.

Pending before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Proctor v. LeClaireCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Toevs v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Smart v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Housing Works, Inc. v. TurnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Livingston v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API