State v. Conroy
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Scott District Court.— HoN. James W. Boll-ingeb, Judge. The defendant was convicted of tbe crime of burglary, and appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwin, C. J.—
l. Evidence. Tbe burglary in question was committed by 'one Burrier, a professional. Tbe defendant’s guilt, if be be guilty, is and must be based on a general conspiracy to commit the crime charged, in 'which ^ had a p^. On the trial Burrier was permitted, without objection, to testify to similar crimes committed by him before, and after tbe alleged conspiracy was formed. Had there been objections to> tbe testimony relating *473to burglaries committed before tbe conspiracy, and to the testimony relative to other burglaries that were not claimed to have been a part of the general…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nodle v. HawthornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Snyder v. FidlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- State v. McGinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. OstbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State v. PhilpottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- State v. BourgeoisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- State v. ConroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907