Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Wilcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to St. Joseph. 'Trover. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The plaintiffs in this case sued the defendant in trover for the conversion of a stock of goods which they claimed under a chattel mortgage given by Gilbert Dickerson. The mortgage bore - date September 14, 1878, and covered a stock of goods with which Dickerson was carrying on business at Three Rivers, and also a number of peddlers’ wagons and the horses in use with the same; “ also all the stock, goods, wares and merchandise that the said party of the first part may add to or get for use in the said business, or for which he shall exchange or trade any of the aforesaid goods, wares,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Farrington v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Cadwell v. PrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. American Cigar Co. v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louden v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In re National Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. Curtis v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Eddy v. McCallMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ferguson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API