Legal Opinion

Eddy v. McCall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are Stated in the opinion, and are summarized in head-note 2.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

This action was trover to recover for a quantity of lumber alleged to be of the value of $1,500, and situated, at the time of the claimed conversion, in the Third ward in the city of Flint. The declaration is in the usual form, containing one count, and alleging damages in the sum of $2,000. The plea is the general issue, with notice that on the trial the defendant will show that, on May 27, 1886, J. L. Littlefield commenced a suit against Samuel J. Lewis, of the city of Flint, and that said property was seized upon the writ as the property of said Lewis ; that judgment was subsequently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gay v. BidwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Leland v. CollverMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Phillips & Son v. BothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Curtis v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kenney v. HurlburtOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hammel v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Ferguson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In re DagwellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API