Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 1912No. 8161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before SeasE, J., Anderson, May term, 1911. Indictment against John Robinson. Defendant appeals. cites: 73 S. C. 383; 81 S. C. 379; 85 S. C. 269; 60 Pac. 112; 12 A. C. R. 585; 24 N. W. R. 843; 27 Cal. 319. cites: 87 S. C. 244.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

Defendant was convicted of assault and battery with intent to kill, and from sentence of five years at hard labor, he appeals.

Defendant’s attorney put up a witness, whose testimony took him by surprise. Thereupon, the following colloquy between defendant’s attorney and the Court took place: “May it please the Court, I know that ordinarily the rules of evidence will not permit one to contradict his own witness, but the evidence of this witness is a complete surprise to me.” The Court: “I don’t see anything at all to indicate that his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DriggersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  2. Black v. Charleston & Western Car. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MishoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. State v. DeasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API