Vance v. Google LLC
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 STEVEN VANCE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04696-BLF 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 GOOGLE LLC, [Re: ECF No. 108] 11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is Defendant Google LLC’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Amended 13 14 Complaint. ECF 108. Plaintiffs Steven Vance and Tim Janecyk, individually and on behalf of others 15 similarly situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), oppose Defendant’s motion. ECF 111. The Court has 16 considered the motion, the relevant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Conservation Force v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.