Legal Opinion
Vickers v. Faubion
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 13, 1920No. 1698PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Error from District Court, Potter County; Henry S. Bishop, Judge. Habeas corpus by Earl W. Faubion against Beulah Vickers and husband for the custody of a minor child. Judgment awarding custody to plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHupp, C. J.
The defendant in error, as relator, brought this action against Beulah and Willie Vickers, in the nature of a habeas corpus, for the custody of a six year old child, Marie Paubion. It is alleged:
“That on the 22d day of March, 1913, he (Earl W. Paubion) was lawfully married to Beulah Lewis, and that said marriage relations continued to exist until the 6th day of January, 1920, and that upon said last-named date said marriage relations were dissolved by a decree of the district court of the Seventeenth judicial district in and for the county of Jefferson, state of Oklahoma, rendered by Hon.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Legate v. LegateTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Wilson v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Jamison v. Gilbert Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Claudius v. MelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bufford v. HollimanTexas Supreme Court · 1853
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Swift v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Conley v. St. JacquesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Krieger v. KriegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Keith v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.