Legal Opinion
Birnbaum v. Misiano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Spinola, J.), dated February 20, 2007, which granted the motion of the defendants James Misiano, Misiano & Shulman, and Misiano, Shulman, Capetola & Kessler, LLR and the *633separate motion of the defendant Steven Shulman, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied his cross motion for summary judgment on the complaint.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hearst v. HearstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Carrasco v. Pena & KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Velie v. Ellis Law, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Levy v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blumencranz v. BotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Esposito v. NotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Lauder v. GoldhamerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020