Legal Opinion
Paysys Int'l, Inc. v. Atos It Servs. Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 20, 2018No. 17-2204-cv; Docket No. 17-2204-cv; August Term, 2017PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Paysys International ("Paysys") moved to voluntarily dismiss its case with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court (Katherine B. Forrest, Judge ) granted that motion on the condition that Paysys pay the defendant-appellees' (collectively, "Atos") attorney's fees. Paysys contends that it was entitled to an opportunity to withdraw its motion rather than acquiesce to the court's terms. We agree. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to give Paysys that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of the Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs & Participating Emp'rsSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Songbyrd, Inc. v. Estate of Albert B. Grossman, Doing Business as Bearsville Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Funk v. BelneftekhimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Gaf Corporation v. Transamerica Insurance Company. Gaf Corporation v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- An v. DespinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Carter v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Chronister v. Derby, Kansas, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- DOE v. Syracuse UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Doe v. IndykeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.