Legal Opinion
Doe v. Indyke
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00484Unknown
1Opinion
USNOIUTTEHDE RSNT ADTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWO UYROTR K ─────────────────────────────────── JANE DOE, Plaintiff, 20-cv-484 (JGK) - against - MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DARREN K. INDYKE, RICHARD D. KAHN, AND GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendants. ─────────────────────────────────── JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff brought this action under a pseudonym as “Jane Doe” against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as appointed executors of the estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the “Epstein Estate”), and Ghislaine Maxwell, seeking declaratory relief and damages…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Antoinette D'Alto Nicholas D'Alto v. Dahon California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Carter v. Incorporated Village of Ocean BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Paysys Int'l, Inc. v. Atos It Servs. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018