Legal Opinion

Fidler v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1951No. 5483PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

By certiorari there is brought before-us for review an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona denying Bert A.. Fidler, petitioner, compensation for an alleged injury. Petitioner was an employee-of Climate Control, Inc., respondent employer, which was insured by the commission. From the record it appears that on June 5, 1950, petitioner suffered an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The accident, occurred when Fidler, who was working in-a bent-over position, stood up and hit his head on a steel pipe. The attending physician, Dr.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ison v. Western Vegetable DistributorsArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Great Western Power Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Tashner v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Caekos v. Stanley Fruit Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Carter v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Harmon v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kuchinski v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Village of Prentice v. Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Ross v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API