Legal Opinion

State v. Tatarinov

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 14, 2007No. C021427CR; A123747PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for 27 counts of identity theft, ORS 165.800; one count of forgery in the first degree, ORS 165.013; and one count of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree, ORS 165.022. He argues that the trial court was required to dismiss the charges against him, because he was not brought to trial within 90 days of sending notice to the prosecuting attorney that he asserted his statutory right to a speedy trial. ORS 135.760 -135.765. We affirm.

The parties have stipulated to the following facts. On May 3, 2002, defendant was indicted in Washington…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State of Oregon v. KuhnhausenOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. BatehamOregon Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Warkentin v. ShireyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. StorkusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API