Legal Opinion
Miller v. Mehltretter
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 19, 2007No. 05-CV-6617LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
The issue in this case is whether a Department of Justice (“DOJ”) official was arbitrary and capricious in directing an FBI agent to decline to testify or produce documents in a New York State court proceeding. This action was commenced under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706. Plaintiff seeks a finding from this Court that the DOJ official, Acting United States Attorney Kathleen M. Mehltretter (“Mehltretter”), arbitrarily and capriciously precluded FBI Special Agent Mark Thompson (“Agent Thompson”) from responding to specific…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goodloe v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Adams v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. WeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- BISTRIAN v. WARDEN TROY LEVIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022