Legal Opinion
Aycock v. Texas Commerce Bank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 30, 1991No. Civ. A. H-89-3600PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HUGHES, District Judge.
1. Introduction.
Two creditors of P.T. Eichelberger, Jr., M.D., and Louis B. Hughes, M.D., assert conflicting security interests to a deposit account at Texas Commerce Bank. Citizens Bank and Trust Company of Baytown (Citizens) claims a prior security interest in the account as proceeds of stock pledged to Citizens. Aycock and others (Aycock) assert a right of setoff to the Texas Commerce account. Citizens takes priority.
2. Facts.
In 1983, Eichelberger and Hughes posted a supersedeas bond to enable them to postpone execution while they appealed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- C. C. Duke and C. T. Duke v. Sun Oil Company and Pan American Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- First National Bank in Grand Prairie v. Lone Star Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- First State Bank of Abernathy v. Holder (In Re Nivens)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
- The First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Plaintiff v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Home Insurance Indemnity Company v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HastieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- In Re HastieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993