Legal Opinion
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Centlivre
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 22, 1993No. Civ. A. Nos. 92-0467, 92-0469PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) has brought suit to enforce indemnification agreements by which defendants agreed to reimburse Travelers for monies required to be paid by it on their behalf when defendants defaulted on their loan obligations. Defendants have refused to honor their indemnification agreements, asserting that but for Travelers’ fraud they would never have entered into the underlying investment arrangements of which the Travelers indemnity agreements were a part. Defendants have also asserted various other affirmative defenses, and have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clinton Hudson & Sons v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farms, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Antinoph v. Laverell Reynolds Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Clinton Hudson & Sons v. Lehigh Valley CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978