Legal Opinion

Broxie v. Household Finance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1974No. Appeal, No. 118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

This appeal has been taken from the lower court’s refusal of appellant’s Motions for New Trial and Judgment N. O. Y. in an action in trespass on the tort of malicious interference with contractual relations. Appellant raises six (6) assignments of error; but for the reason hereinafter set forth, the merits of basic contentions raised will not be reached. We must reverse and remand for a new trial.

The appellee contends, and the lower court so held, that if defendant (appellant) knew or should have known with substantial certainty that the result would occur, implied intent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SharpeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. KulikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Toddes v. HaferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Broxie v. Household Finance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Broxie v. Household Finance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Broxie v. Household Finance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Broxie v. Household Finance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API