Legal Opinion

Wright v. Waite

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1914No. Nos. 18,529—(76)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for Stearns county to recover $468 under the terms of a certain agreement. The case was tried before Nye, J., who denied plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict for the amount claimed, and a jury which returned a verdict for $480.87 in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, C.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover an agreed commission upon the sale of lands. There was a verdict for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals from the order denying his blended motion for judgment or a new trial.

It is conceded that in October, 1911, the defendant listed certain land with the plaintiff. He gave her no exclusive agency. The jury found that she obtained a purchaser on June 28, 1912. The defendant makes four definite claims':(1) That he revoked plaintiff’s authority.(2) That he sold the land himself.(3) That the court erred in holding that a recovery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Land Ass'n v. BanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Gregory Co. v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Wilson v. HoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Mott v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartig v. SchraderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Confer Bros. v. CurrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Burke v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. Ballweber v. KernNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Potts v. ThompsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API