Legal Opinion

Hartig v. Schrader

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 15, 1921PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Fourth Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op ti-ie Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Affirming.

On and. prior to August 7, 1914, appellant, Charlotte Hartig, was the owner of certain real ©state at Third and Walnut Streets in Louisville. On that day, through her agent, Wuesthoff, she placed same in the hands of appellee, Schrader, for sale at .the price of $36,000, fixing his commission at $1,000 if he effected the sale.

Schrader, after several futile efforts, was unable to bring about a sale, and in 1915 the property was withdrawn from the market and the agreement between the parties terminated.

Pripr to this, and in 1904, Mrs.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wray v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. Baars v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Owl Canon Gypsum Co. v. FergusonColorado Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Lewis v. Dahl (Butt, Garnishers)Utah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Croxton's Extrx. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Miller v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Shanklin v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API