Legal Opinion

Ford v. Canton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 29, 1988No. 85-1485PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a directed verdict and a special verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Kenneth Canton, and against defendants, Richard Ford, G. Reynolds Brabner III, and Bay Area Office Supply Equipment, Inc. ("Bay Area") in plaintiff's action for breach of an option agreement and note. Defendants' motion for a new trial or, in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, was granted in part so as to reduce the award of attorney fees but denied in all other respects. We reverse and remand.

The pertinent facts of this case are as follows. The defendants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Lloyd v. Service Corp. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Ross v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green Tree Financial Corporatoin v. WamplerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Standard Plan, Inc. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Norman Properties v. BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Marks v. Intergraph Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Richey v. Summit Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API