Legal Opinion
Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1990No. 89-1032PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOTION TO DISMISS
KING, Judge.
The mover-appellee, Sikorsky Aircraft Division, United Technologies Corporation (hereinafter Sikorsky), moves to dismiss *204the appeal taken by plaintiffs-appellants, Petroleum Helicopters and Peoples Insurance Company of China on two grounds. Sikorsky argues that the appellants have been fully satisfied as to all damages, therefore the appellants have no right to recover from Sikorsky and, secondly, that appellant’s appeal was not timely filed.
This suit arises from the crash of a helicopter. Plaintiffs filed suit against the manufacturer of the helicopter (Sikorsky)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Harvey v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Wall v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Joseph v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williamson v. CIGNA/INSURANCE CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Miller v. Crescent City Health Care CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Miller v. Crescent City Health Care CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mother of Eden, LLC v. Chris ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990