Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 2009No. 2008-CA-1347Published

1DissentTobias, J.

hi respectfully concur in the majority’s ruling that the peremptory exception of prescription filed by the defendant/appel-lee, Crescent City Health Services (“Crescent City”), was properly sustained by the trial court. I state my reasoning infra. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s ruling that overrules Crescent City’s dilatory exception of prematurity.

My review of the record establishes the facts of this case to be as follows:

This case arises out a claim filed by John Miller (“Miller”) against Crescent City, alleging that it provided improper care to Vivian Miller…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Reeder v. NorthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Russo v. Texas & Pac. R. R.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. State v. HattonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  5. Unwired Telecom v. Parish of CalcasieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API