Legal Opinion

Carbajal v. Tessier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 25, 1927No. 28400PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

This is a suit for specific performance. It was met, on the part of Charles A. Tessier, Jr., by the exception of no cause and no right of action, and that plaintiff’s co-owners of the property involved in the suit cannot be impleaded and brought into the litigation as defendants; and, on the part of Mrs. Doretta Bickman, a defendant in the suit and a co-owner of the property, by exceptions of no cause and no right of action and misjoinder of parties. The exceptions of no cause of action and misjoinder of parties were sustained by the court, and plaintiff’s suit was dismissed. From this…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seeger v. SeegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. D'Avricourt v. SeegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Carbajal v. BickmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  4. Dorvin-Huddleston Developments, Inc. v. ConnollyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Gentilly Development Co. v. CarbajalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API