Legal Opinion

Carbajal v. Bickmann

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 6, 1939No. 35094PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Mrs. Henrietta S. Carbajal sued for a partition by licitation of certain real estate and other assets.

The defendants, her sisters, Mrs. Marie S. Manzella and Mrs. Doretta S. Bickmann, in their answer, admitted the co-ownership in indivisión in the proportion of an undivided one-third each of the three heirs and that the property was not divisible in kind, but they claimed that Mrs. Manzella should be paid $75,000, and Mrs. Bickmann, $20,000, under written agreements dated February 9, 1926, and March 26, 1926, between the parties, out of the remaining mass of the succession…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sharp v. ZellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  3. Moreira v. SchwanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. Sewell v. Scott.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  5. Greenwood Planting & Mfg. Co. v. Whitney Central Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norah v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Johnson v. LemonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Fouchaux v. Board of CommissionersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Quinette v. DelhommerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Succession of QuaglinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API