Legal Opinion
Nathaniel Griffin v. City of South Pasadena
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided April 24, 2026No. 8:25-cv-02787Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION NATHANIEL GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:25-cv-02787-WFJ-CPT CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA, Defendant. ________________________________________/ ORDER Before the Court is Defendant City of South Pasadena’s (the “City”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. 39. Plaintiff Griffin has responded in opposition, Dkt. 42, and Defendant replied. Dkt. 43. After careful consideration, the Court grants in part and denies in part the City’s motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND This employment dispute…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.