Legal Opinion

Farmers Bank v. Chicago Title Insurance

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 7, 2005No. 0160, Sept. Term, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

In this case we study negligence and the economic damages rule, negotiable instruments and the loss allocation rules of the Uniform Commercial Code regarding drawers, drawees, and depositary banks. We decide that it is necessary to address the novel question of whether a drawer can sue a depositary bank in negligence, because the Uniform Commercial Code’s loss allocation rules are largely inapplicable. We decide that it can, under the particular circumstances of this case.

FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In November 1997, Mark Shannahan, a customer of Farmers Bank of Maryland…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Insurance v. Allfirst BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Iglesias v. Pentagon Title & Escrow, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Bancorp BankDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  4. AOD Federal Credit Union v. State FarmCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Select Express, LLC v. American Trade Bindery, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API