Farmers Bank v. Chicago Title Insurance
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
In this case we study negligence and the economic damages rule, negotiable instruments and the loss allocation rules of the Uniform Commercial Code regarding drawers, drawees, and depositary banks. We decide that it is necessary to address the novel question of whether a drawer can sue a depositary bank in negligence, because the Uniform Commercial Code’s loss allocation rules are largely inapplicable. We decide that it can, under the particular circumstances of this case.
FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In November 1997, Mark Shannahan, a customer of Farmers Bank of Maryland…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Allfirst BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Iglesias v. Pentagon Title & Escrow, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Bancorp BankDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- AOD Federal Credit Union v. State FarmCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Select Express, LLC v. American Trade Bindery, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.