Legal Opinion
United States v. O'Connell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 9, 1973No. 73 Civ. 68PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUFFY, District Judge.
The question presented by this case is whether the United States of America, as fee owner of a housing project in Peekskill, New York, has obtained an easement by use or by implication over two parcels of land, one of which is a private road immediately contiguous to a parking lot owned by the project.
*926By order of this Court dated March 5, 1973, the Government’s motion for a preliminary injunction was consolidated, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with the trial of the case. At the beginning of the trial, certain facts were stipulated by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walkovszky v. CarltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Brock v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Spencer v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Jacobson v. Luzon Lumber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Cosmopolitan National Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. John v. O'COnnell and Jopat Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Bushart v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974