Legal Opinion

Bushart v. West

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 15, 1974No. 47,416PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is an action for declaratory judgment wherein plaintiff L. M. Bushart seeks a determination that defendants’ use of his property for ingress and egress to an alley is permissive only, as by license, and may be made conditional. Plaintiff appeals from a determination that an implied easement exists instead.

Trial was to the court. Essentially there was little or no dispute as to the facts disclosed under the evidence. The property involved consists of three lots, numbered ten, eleven, twelve, located on block thirty-three fronting on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Van Sandt v. RoysterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Hogue v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Farley v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. United States v. O'ConnellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fausett v. FausettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Hengen v. HengenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API