Bushart v. West
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harman, C.:
This is an action for declaratory judgment wherein plaintiff L. M. Bushart seeks a determination that defendants’ use of his property for ingress and egress to an alley is permissive only, as by license, and may be made conditional. Plaintiff appeals from a determination that an implied easement exists instead.
Trial was to the court. Essentially there was little or no dispute as to the facts disclosed under the evidence. The property involved consists of three lots, numbered ten, eleven, twelve, located on block thirty-three fronting on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Van Sandt v. RoysterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Hogue v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Farley v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- United States v. O'ConnellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fausett v. FausettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hengen v. HengenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982