Legal Opinion

Hicks & Brother v. Ross & Redditt

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1888No. 2530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Shelby. Tried below before the Hon. James I. Perkins. This is an appeal from a judgment in the district court in an appeal case from a justice’s court, the issue being the ownership of a bale of cotton of the value of thirty dollars. Appellants claim title under one Mrs. Snyder, the mother of John C. Gibbs, under whom the appellees claim. The facts are given in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

Ross & Bedditt, having a mortgage upon the cotton crop upon eight acres cultivated by Jno. C. Gibbs, brought suit to foreclose the lien upon a bale of the cotton. After it was seized by the sheriff, under a writ of sequestration, Hicks & Bro. made affidavit of ownership and filed claim bond under the statute.

In the justice’s court Boss & Bedditt recovered, as also in the district court, and Hicks & Bro. appeal.

It appears that Gibbs, on July 12, 1886, made a mortgage to Ross & Bedditt, to secure seventy-five dollars and future advances, upon his entire cotton crop…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gruner v. WestinTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fincher v. BennettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Ft. Dearborn Trust & Sav. Bank v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Parker v. Panhandle National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Jarvis v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API