Legal Opinion

Ensign v. Ensign

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for a reargument. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.

The correct answer to the fundamental question of jurisdiction presented upon this motion depends upon the accurate interpretation of section 1763 of the Code of Civil Procedure, applicable to actions for separation, which reads as follows: “ Such an action may be maintained in either of the following cases: 1. Where both parties are residents of the State when the action is commenced. 2. Where the parties were married within the State and the plaintiff is a resident thereof when the action is commenced. 3. Where the parties, having been married without the State, have become residents of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Dupuy v. . WurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. De Meli v. . De MeliNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Crawford v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Gray v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duxstad v. DuxstadWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Elwell v. ElwellNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  3. McDonald v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API