Legal Opinion

County of Lancaster v. Schwarz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1950No. 32844PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

The trial court in this action refused to confirm a tax sale where there had been a full payment of the amount required to redeem, a payment made by one holding a conveyance from the owner at the time of the decree and sale. The purchaser at the foreclosure sale appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On August 9, 1946, petition was filed for the foreclosure of tax liens on three lots in the city of Lincoln involved in this action, and other lands. Maude K. Sutton, as owner, was a party defendant. • On September 18, 1946, the cause went to decree in which the court found the amount…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bateman v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  2. County of Lancaster v. SchwarzNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Central Life Assurance Society v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Lynde v. WakefieldMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Nichols & Shepard Co. v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indian Hills Community Church v. County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Babb v. FrankDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1996
  3. City of Philadelphia v. OrlinerPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API