Legal Opinion

Masters v. Bissett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1990No. A8407-04366; CA A50580Published

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Both respondents (grandchildren) and appellant (trustee) seek reconsideration of our opinion in Masters v. Bissett (A50580), 101 Or App 184, 790 P2d 30 (1990). Grandchildren contend in their petition for review, which we treat as a petition for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), that we erred in concluding that the trial court retained jurisdiction to authorize payment of trust expenses after trustee filed a notice of appeal. Trustee, by a motion for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(6), contends that we neglected to address one of his assignments of error in what we denominated the distribution case.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Masters v. BissettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API