Empiregas, Inc., of Elberta v. Feely
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict of $10,650.00 in favor of the plaintiffs in a malicious prosecution case. The defendant, Empiregas, Inc., of Elberta, alleges four grounds for reversal: (1) That the trial court erred in submitting to the jury the plaintiffs' claim based upon malicious prosecution; (2) that the trial court erred in failing to fully charge the jury as to the agency of one of the witnesses; (3) that the trial court erred in failing to adequately instruct the jury as to the limitation of recovery; and, (4) that the trial court erred in failing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Birwood Paper Company v. DamskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Kitchens v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- City of Birmingham v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Congleton v. Jackson County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Poff v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Fina Oil and Chemical Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Eubanks v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- McCray v. City of DothanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.