Dylan Herrington v. Target Corporation
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 5:23-cv-01676-MRA-SHK 11 DYLAN HERRINGTON, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD 13 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH 14 TARGET CORPORATION, PREJUDICE [ECF 33] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is Defendant Target Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff 20 Dylan Herrington’s Third Amended Complaint (the “Motion”). ECF 33. The Court read 21 and considered the Motion and deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral 22 argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.