Legal Opinion

Dylan Herrington v. Target Corporation

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 28, 2024No. 5:23-cv-01676Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 5:23-cv-01676-MRA-SHK 11 DYLAN HERRINGTON, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD 13 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH 14 TARGET CORPORATION, PREJUDICE [ECF 33] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is Defendant Target Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff 20 Dylan Herrington’s Third Amended Complaint (the “Motion”). ECF 33. The Court read 21 and considered the Motion and deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral 22 argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API