Legal Opinion

Hadley v. Farmers Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1927No. 15853PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

Plaintiff in error, Roscoe E. Hadley, who was plaintiff below, being indebted to one J. R. Cottingham and being the holder and owner of a bank check drawn by C. G. Watts in favor of I-Iaclley on the First State Bank of Wagoner, Okla.. for the sum of $855, indorsed in blank and delivered the cheek to his creditor, Cottingham. Cottingham gave Hadley credit for the amount of the check, and being a customer of the defendant in error, the Farmers National Bank of Oklahoma City, through his agent, McCracken, deposited the check with said bank for collection. The Farmers National Bank…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Little v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Railroad Co. v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Kilpatrick v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Chesebrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Comm'rs of Wabaunsee Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McWethy v. Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1939
  3. City of Wewoka v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Owens v. CohlmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. EakinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API